A man out of his depth, trying to sound impressive.
I've pulled this video. Now that he has the nomination I'm neutral, in a pox-on-both-their-houses way.
When people say Trump voters are "venting," this is what they mean.
Take my friend Steve as an example. He runs a 15-person firm in New York City. It’s a business he started, and I assume he makes a lot of money. He’s very conservative politically. Last fall he told me he was supporting Trump. When I asked why, he explained he was tired of political correctness and sick of Wall Street bankers getting away with murder. And then he told me about the stresses of his business—specifically, that he works with people who sign contracts featuring non-compete clauses with major corporations. When their time is up and they’re ready to move on, their employers threaten them with legal action due to the non-compete clauses. These claims are without merit, Steve says, but litigating them would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. So his people stay where they are. It’s unfair, he says.
What on earth, I asked, does he think Trump would do to help him and his clients with a non-compete problem? What does this have to do with anything? It’s the big guys, Steve said. The big guys are lording it over the little guys.
Now, in no way is Steve a little guy—except by comparison with major corporations. But he feels like the little guy.
This illuminated my understanding of the Trump phenomenon. His candidacy is an emotional outlet for his supporters. They have taken his message about “winning” and the “losers” who are running things and doing it badly—and they have applied it to their own circumstances.
Often she uses words not exclusively for their meaning but as intensifiers. For example, she sometimes likes to establish a rhythm with a number of double stresses. In the first eight lines of "In the Aquarium" one finds "front door," "back garden," "guests stream," "straight line," "then stop," "dark fish," "night sky," "moon like," "just short," "calm pool" and "blind friend." One has the sense of certain words being used primarily for stress. Does it really matter if the fish in the poem is a light or dark one? The reader comes partly to distrust her language, feeling that word choices may be made for reasons other than sense. This, coupled with the lack of proportion, tends to weaken the credibility of an entire poem. Instead of the single poem existing as a unity, a complete whole, it is often a series of parts. These may often be very strong even though the poem itself is flawed.
My disappointment in the lyrics to "Alexander Hamilton," and in nearly all other lyrics I hear, arises from a similar loss of trust. There are songs I love, but most of them require a lot of forgiving.
When I heard George Harrison used the title for the opening words of "Something," I was thrilled. I didn't feel like I was being poached at all — besides, "Something in the Way She Moves" quotes the Beatles' "I Feel Fine": "She's around me almost all the time/And I feel fine."
Good excerpt at Delanceyplace today, from the book Final Jeopardy: Man vs. Machine and the Quest to Know Everything.
Most of what humans experience as perception is actually furnished by the memory. This is because the conscious brain can only process a trickle of data. Psychologists agree that only one to four 'items,' either thoughts or sensations, can be held in mind, immediately available to consciousness, at the same time. Some have tried to quantify these constraints. According to the work of Manfred Zimmerman of Germany's Heidelberg University, only a woeful fifty bits of information per second make their way into the conscious brain, while an estimated eleven million bits of data flow from the senses every second. Many psychologists object to these attempts to measure thoughts and perceptions as digital bits. But however they're measured, the stark limits of the mind are clear.
(That's a small excerpt of the excerpt.)
This level of ignorance can tear the country apart. Or give us a choice of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, which amounts to the same thing.
Exit polls in the Michigan primary show that Democrats and Republicans oppose trade — by nearly equal margins.
A majority of voters in both parties — 53% among Republicans, 56% among Democrats — said that trade "takes away U.S. jobs." Only 34% of Republicans and 31% of Democrats say that trade "creates more U.S. jobs."
Alan S. Blinder's explanation of the benefits from free trade should be taught in every year of high school.
Laying down a marker:
I consider politician Donald Trump a wealthy buffoon with extraordinary luck.
If Trump wins the nomination and the presidency (against a Democratic opponent both healthy and unindicted), I'll declare I was wrong.
I won't be happy about it.